Canada vs Hungary: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Canada
- Hungary
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 23.72 kg/ha against 23.66 kg/ha in Canada, a difference of 0.06 kg/ha.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Hungary has been ahead every year.
Canada ranks 84th and Hungary ranks 83rd of 201 countries.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Hungary | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.28 kg/ha | 18.76 kg/ha | 15.48 kg/ha | Hungary |
| 1970s | 5.54 kg/ha | 36.65 kg/ha | 31.11 kg/ha | Hungary |
| 1980s | 9 kg/ha | 43.87 kg/ha | 34.86 kg/ha | Hungary |
| 1990s | 11.18 kg/ha | 22.52 kg/ha | 11.34 kg/ha | Hungary |
| 2000s | 13.23 kg/ha | 24.46 kg/ha | 11.23 kg/ha | Hungary |
| 2010s | 19.44 kg/ha | 28.93 kg/ha | 9.48 kg/ha | Hungary |
| 2020s | 22.33 kg/ha | 31.71 kg/ha | 9.39 kg/ha | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Canada or Hungary?
- Hungary, at 23.72 kg/ha against 23.66 kg/ha in Canada as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Canada and Hungary?
- 0.06 kg/ha, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Hungary?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Canada and Hungary rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Canada ranks 84th and Hungary ranks 83rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).