Central African Republic vs Sudan: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Central African Republic
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 2.92 kg/ha against 2.48 kg/ha in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.44 kg/ha.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.2 times Central African Republic's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Central African Republic ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 174th and Sudan ranks 172nd of 186 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3.19 kg/ha | 2.65 kg/ha | 0.5399 kg/ha | Central African Republic |
| 2020s | 2.51 kg/ha | 3.38 kg/ha | 0.8659 kg/ha | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Central African Republic or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 2.92 kg/ha against 2.48 kg/ha in Central African Republic as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Central African Republic and Sudan?
- 0.44 kg/ha, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Central African Republic and Sudan rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Central African Republic ranks 174th and Sudan ranks 172nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).