Central America vs Montenegro: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Central America
- Montenegro
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 116.68 kg/ha against 22.74 kg/ha in Central America, a difference of 93.94 kg/ha.
That makes Montenegro's figure about 5.1 times Central America's.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Montenegro has been ahead every year.
Central America ranks 10th and Montenegro ranks 7th of 29 groups.
Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central America | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.9 kg/ha | 157.48 kg/ha | 140.59 kg/ha | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 21.66 kg/ha | 133.67 kg/ha | 112.01 kg/ha | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 21.3 kg/ha | 116.49 kg/ha | 95.19 kg/ha | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Central America or Montenegro?
- Montenegro, at 116.68 kg/ha against 22.74 kg/ha in Central America as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Central America and Montenegro?
- 93.94 kg/ha, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central America and Montenegro?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Central America and Montenegro rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Central America ranks 10th and Montenegro ranks 7th of 29 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).