Costa Rica vs Democratic People's Republic of Korea: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area

Costa Rica
71.59 kg/ha
in 2023
Democratic People's Republic of Korea
5.36 kg/ha
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
14th
Democratic People's Republic of Korea rank
14th

Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Democratic People's Republic of Korea
020406080196119922023

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 71.59 kg/ha against 5.36 kg/ha in Democratic People's Republic of Korea, a difference of 66.23 kg/ha.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 13.4 times Democratic People's Republic of Korea's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Democratic People's Republic of Korea ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 14th and Democratic People's Republic of Korea ranks 14th of 186 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 4 and Democratic People's Republic of Korea in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Democratic People's Republic of Korea Difference Ahead
1960s 17.23 kg/ha 18.44 kg/ha 1.21 kg/ha Democratic People's Republic of Korea
1970s 28.63 kg/ha 47.28 kg/ha 18.65 kg/ha Democratic People's Republic of Korea
1980s 39.15 kg/ha 78.17 kg/ha 39.03 kg/ha Democratic People's Republic of Korea
1990s 58.33 kg/ha 45.56 kg/ha 12.77 kg/ha Costa Rica
2000s 57.72 kg/ha 15.72 kg/ha 42 kg/ha Costa Rica
2010s 69.95 kg/ha 17.85 kg/ha 52.1 kg/ha Costa Rica
2020s 68.05 kg/ha 5.16 kg/ha 62.89 kg/ha Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Costa Rica or Democratic People's Republic of Korea?
Costa Rica, at 71.59 kg/ha against 5.36 kg/ha in Democratic People's Republic of Korea as of 2023.
What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Costa Rica and Democratic People's Republic of Korea?
66.23 kg/ha, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Democratic People's Republic of Korea?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Democratic People's Republic of Korea rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
Costa Rica ranks 14th and Democratic People's Republic of Korea ranks 14th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Democratic People's Republic of Korea: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/volatilisation-cropland-nitrogen-per-unit-area/costa-rica/democratic-people-s-republic-of-korea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/volatilisation-cropland-nitrogen-per-unit-area/costa-rica/democratic-people-s-republic-of-korea/">Costa Rica vs Democratic People's Republic of Korea: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).