Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Syrian Arab Republic: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area

Democratic Republic of the Congo
0.8998 kg/ha
in 2023
Syrian Arab Republic
3.51 kg/ha
in 2023
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
18th
Syrian Arab Republic rank
16th

Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time

  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Syrian Arab Republic
051015196119922023

How they compare

Syrian Arab Republic currently reports 3.51 kg/ha against 0.8998 kg/ha in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 2.61 kg/ha.

That makes Syrian Arab Republic's figure about 3.9 times Democratic Republic of the Congo's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Syrian Arab Republic ahead.

Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 18th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 16th of 18 countries.

Syrian Arab Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of the Congo Syrian Arab Republic Difference Ahead
1960s 0.4226 kg/ha 0.7583 kg/ha 0.3358 kg/ha Syrian Arab Republic
1970s 0.6386 kg/ha 2.61 kg/ha 1.97 kg/ha Syrian Arab Republic
1980s 0.6702 kg/ha 6.88 kg/ha 6.21 kg/ha Syrian Arab Republic
1990s 0.8518 kg/ha 11.6 kg/ha 10.75 kg/ha Syrian Arab Republic
2000s 0.742 kg/ha 13.34 kg/ha 12.6 kg/ha Syrian Arab Republic
2010s 0.6558 kg/ha 2.86 kg/ha 2.2 kg/ha Syrian Arab Republic
2020s 0.8062 kg/ha 1.8 kg/ha 0.9949 kg/ha Syrian Arab Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Democratic Republic of the Congo or Syrian Arab Republic?
Syrian Arab Republic, at 3.51 kg/ha against 0.8998 kg/ha in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Democratic Republic of the Congo and Syrian Arab Republic?
2.61 kg/ha, with Syrian Arab Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and Syrian Arab Republic?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 18th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 16th of 18 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Syrian Arab Republic: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/volatilisation-cropland-nitrogen-per-unit-area/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/syrian-arab-republic-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/volatilisation-cropland-nitrogen-per-unit-area/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/syrian-arab-republic-2/">Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Syrian Arab Republic: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).