Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Trinidad and Tobago: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area

Democratic Republic of the Congo
0.8998 kg/ha
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
65.45 kg/ha
in 2023
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
18th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
21st

Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time

  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Trinidad and Tobago
020406080100196119922023

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 65.45 kg/ha against 0.8998 kg/ha in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 64.55 kg/ha.

That makes Trinidad and Tobago's figure about 72.7 times Democratic Republic of the Congo's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.

Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 18th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 21st of 18 countries.

Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of the Congo Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 0.4226 kg/ha 17.11 kg/ha 16.69 kg/ha Trinidad and Tobago
1970s 0.6386 kg/ha 23.5 kg/ha 22.86 kg/ha Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 0.6702 kg/ha 27.14 kg/ha 26.47 kg/ha Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 0.8518 kg/ha 38.97 kg/ha 38.12 kg/ha Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 0.742 kg/ha 69.28 kg/ha 68.54 kg/ha Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 0.6558 kg/ha 81.92 kg/ha 81.27 kg/ha Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 0.8062 kg/ha 65.72 kg/ha 64.91 kg/ha Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Democratic Republic of the Congo or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 65.45 kg/ha against 0.8998 kg/ha in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Democratic Republic of the Congo and Trinidad and Tobago?
64.55 kg/ha, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and Trinidad and Tobago?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 18th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 21st of 18 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Trinidad and Tobago: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/volatilisation-cropland-nitrogen-per-unit-area/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/volatilisation-cropland-nitrogen-per-unit-area/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/trinidad-and-tobago/">Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Trinidad and Tobago: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).