Eritrea vs Kiribati: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Eritrea
- Kiribati
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 3.24 kg/ha against 3.03 kg/ha in Kiribati, a difference of 0.21 kg/ha.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.1 times Kiribati's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 181st and Kiribati ranks 184th of 201 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.35 kg/ha | 1.42 kg/ha | 2.93 kg/ha | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 3.21 kg/ha | 2.34 kg/ha | 0.8717 kg/ha | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 3.29 kg/ha | 2.89 kg/ha | 0.4033 kg/ha | Eritrea |
| 2020s | 3.72 kg/ha | 3.01 kg/ha | 0.7026 kg/ha | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Eritrea or Kiribati?
- Eritrea, at 3.24 kg/ha against 3.03 kg/ha in Kiribati as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Eritrea and Kiribati?
- 0.21 kg/ha, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Kiribati?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Eritrea and Kiribati rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Eritrea ranks 181st and Kiribati ranks 184th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).