Estonia vs Tuvalu: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Estonia
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Tuvalu currently reports 19.04 kg/ha against 18.99 kg/ha in Estonia, a difference of 0.05 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 105th and Tuvalu ranks 104th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 2 and Tuvalu in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 13.18 kg/ha | 13.88 kg/ha | 0.6979 kg/ha | Tuvalu |
| 2000s | 16.39 kg/ha | 18.29 kg/ha | 1.9 kg/ha | Tuvalu |
| 2010s | 19.42 kg/ha | 18.99 kg/ha | 0.4268 kg/ha | Estonia |
| 2020s | 20.76 kg/ha | 19.12 kg/ha | 1.64 kg/ha | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Estonia or Tuvalu?
- Tuvalu, at 19.04 kg/ha against 18.99 kg/ha in Estonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Estonia and Tuvalu?
- 0.05 kg/ha, with Tuvalu ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Tuvalu?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Tuvalu rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Estonia ranks 105th and Tuvalu ranks 104th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).