Eswatini vs Maldives: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Eswatini
- Maldives
How they compare
Maldives currently reports 14.57 kg/ha against 13.99 kg/ha in Eswatini, a difference of 0.58 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 123rd and Maldives ranks 122nd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 6 and Maldives in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Maldives | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 8.04 kg/ha | 0 kg/ha | 8.04 kg/ha | Eswatini |
| 1970s | 10.7 kg/ha | 0 kg/ha | 10.7 kg/ha | Eswatini |
| 1980s | 15.17 kg/ha | 0 kg/ha | 15.17 kg/ha | Eswatini |
| 1990s | 8.34 kg/ha | 0 kg/ha | 8.34 kg/ha | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 9.62 kg/ha | 3.14 kg/ha | 6.48 kg/ha | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 11.62 kg/ha | 13.87 kg/ha | 2.25 kg/ha | Maldives |
| 2020s | 14.54 kg/ha | 13.61 kg/ha | 0.9284 kg/ha | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Eswatini or Maldives?
- Maldives, at 14.57 kg/ha against 13.99 kg/ha in Eswatini as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Eswatini and Maldives?
- 0.58 kg/ha, with Maldives ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Maldives?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Maldives rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Eswatini ranks 123rd and Maldives ranks 122nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).