Ethiopia PDR vs Senegal: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Ethiopia PDR
- Senegal
How they compare
Senegal currently reports 2.52 kg/ha against 2.35 kg/ha in Ethiopia PDR, a difference of 0.17 kg/ha.
That makes Senegal's figure about 1.1 times Ethiopia PDR's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ethiopia PDR ahead.
Ethiopia PDR ranks 188th and Senegal ranks 187th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ethiopia PDR averaged higher in 3 and Senegal in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia PDR | Senegal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.15 kg/ha | 0.7585 kg/ha | 0.3904 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1970s | 1.26 kg/ha | 1.37 kg/ha | 0.1126 kg/ha | Senegal |
| 1980s | 1.69 kg/ha | 1.31 kg/ha | 0.3794 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1990s | 2.39 kg/ha | 1.69 kg/ha | 0.6968 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Ethiopia PDR or Senegal?
- Senegal, at 2.52 kg/ha against 2.35 kg/ha in Ethiopia PDR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Ethiopia PDR and Senegal?
- 0.17 kg/ha, with Senegal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and Senegal?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Ethiopia PDR and Senegal rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Ethiopia PDR ranks 188th and Senegal ranks 187th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).