Finland vs Peru: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Finland
- Peru
How they compare
Finland currently reports 17.23 kg/ha against 16.92 kg/ha in Peru, a difference of 0.31 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Peru ahead.
Finland ranks 113th and Peru ranks 114th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 5 and Peru in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 15.01 kg/ha | 13.43 kg/ha | 1.57 kg/ha | Finland |
| 1970s | 23.2 kg/ha | 13.07 kg/ha | 10.13 kg/ha | Finland |
| 1980s | 25.71 kg/ha | 11.29 kg/ha | 14.43 kg/ha | Finland |
| 1990s | 22.49 kg/ha | 11.3 kg/ha | 11.19 kg/ha | Finland |
| 2000s | 19.39 kg/ha | 17.63 kg/ha | 1.76 kg/ha | Finland |
| 2010s | 17.72 kg/ha | 20.82 kg/ha | 3.1 kg/ha | Peru |
| 2020s | 16.55 kg/ha | 19.48 kg/ha | 2.92 kg/ha | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Finland or Peru?
- Finland, at 17.23 kg/ha against 16.92 kg/ha in Peru as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Finland and Peru?
- 0.31 kg/ha, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Peru?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Finland and Peru rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Finland ranks 113th and Peru ranks 114th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).