Georgia vs Slovenia: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Georgia
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 33.42 kg/ha against 33.11 kg/ha in Georgia, a difference of 0.31 kg/ha.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Slovenia has been ahead every year.
Georgia ranks 54th and Slovenia ranks 53rd of 201 countries.
Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 12.71 kg/ha | 51.31 kg/ha | 38.6 kg/ha | Slovenia |
| 2000s | 12.65 kg/ha | 45.84 kg/ha | 33.2 kg/ha | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 14.22 kg/ha | 35.98 kg/ha | 21.76 kg/ha | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 33.53 kg/ha | 36.09 kg/ha | 2.56 kg/ha | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Georgia or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 33.42 kg/ha against 33.11 kg/ha in Georgia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Georgia and Slovenia?
- 0.31 kg/ha, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Slovenia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Georgia and Slovenia rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Georgia ranks 54th and Slovenia ranks 53rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).