Guatemala vs Japan: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Guatemala
- Japan
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 28.45 kg/ha against 28.11 kg/ha in Japan, a difference of 0.34 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Japan ahead.
Guatemala ranks 68th and Japan ranks 70th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 1 and Japan in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 6.37 kg/ha | 32.73 kg/ha | 26.36 kg/ha | Japan |
| 1970s | 11.37 kg/ha | 37.29 kg/ha | 25.92 kg/ha | Japan |
| 1980s | 14.76 kg/ha | 38.18 kg/ha | 23.41 kg/ha | Japan |
| 1990s | 22.3 kg/ha | 34.84 kg/ha | 12.54 kg/ha | Japan |
| 2000s | 22.67 kg/ha | 31.92 kg/ha | 9.25 kg/ha | Japan |
| 2010s | 28.83 kg/ha | 29.01 kg/ha | 0.1815 kg/ha | Japan |
| 2020s | 28.63 kg/ha | 28.36 kg/ha | 0.269 kg/ha | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Guatemala or Japan?
- Guatemala, at 28.45 kg/ha against 28.11 kg/ha in Japan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Guatemala and Japan?
- 0.34 kg/ha, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Japan?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Guatemala and Japan rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Guatemala ranks 68th and Japan ranks 70th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).