Ireland vs Uzbekistan: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Ireland
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 86.79 kg/ha against 80.16 kg/ha in Ireland, a difference of 6.63 kg/ha.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.1 times Ireland's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Ireland ahead.
Ireland ranks 13th and Uzbekistan ranks 10th of 185 countries.
Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ireland | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 106.19 kg/ha | 55.47 kg/ha | 50.72 kg/ha | Ireland |
| 2000s | 82.98 kg/ha | 44.56 kg/ha | 38.42 kg/ha | Ireland |
| 2010s | 88.11 kg/ha | 63.7 kg/ha | 24.41 kg/ha | Ireland |
| 2020s | 91.51 kg/ha | 82.55 kg/ha | 8.96 kg/ha | Ireland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Ireland or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 86.79 kg/ha against 80.16 kg/ha in Ireland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Ireland and Uzbekistan?
- 6.63 kg/ha, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Ireland and Uzbekistan rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Ireland ranks 13th and Uzbekistan ranks 10th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).