Kazakhstan vs Vanuatu: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Kazakhstan
- Vanuatu
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 2.31 kg/ha against 2.08 kg/ha in Vanuatu, a difference of 0.23 kg/ha.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Vanuatu's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 189th and Vanuatu ranks 191st of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Vanuatu in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Vanuatu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.2 kg/ha | 2.53 kg/ha | 0.3319 kg/ha | Vanuatu |
| 2000s | 1.65 kg/ha | 2.63 kg/ha | 0.9783 kg/ha | Vanuatu |
| 2010s | 2.4 kg/ha | 2.74 kg/ha | 0.3436 kg/ha | Vanuatu |
| 2020s | 2.34 kg/ha | 2.12 kg/ha | 0.2133 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Kazakhstan or Vanuatu?
- Kazakhstan, at 2.31 kg/ha against 2.08 kg/ha in Vanuatu as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Kazakhstan and Vanuatu?
- 0.23 kg/ha, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Vanuatu?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kazakhstan and Vanuatu rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Kazakhstan ranks 189th and Vanuatu ranks 191st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).