Kiribati vs Libya: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Kiribati
- Libya
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 3.03 kg/ha against 2.93 kg/ha in Libya, a difference of 0.1 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Kiribati ahead.
Kiribati ranks 170th and Libya ranks 171st of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 2 and Libya in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.7928 kg/ha | 0.5673 kg/ha | 0.2254 kg/ha | Kiribati |
| 1970s | 0.9509 kg/ha | 1.99 kg/ha | 1.04 kg/ha | Libya |
| 1980s | 1.09 kg/ha | 4.74 kg/ha | 3.65 kg/ha | Libya |
| 1990s | 1.36 kg/ha | 4.41 kg/ha | 3.04 kg/ha | Libya |
| 2000s | 2.34 kg/ha | 4.88 kg/ha | 2.54 kg/ha | Libya |
| 2010s | 2.89 kg/ha | 4.24 kg/ha | 1.34 kg/ha | Libya |
| 2020s | 3.01 kg/ha | 2.91 kg/ha | 0.1063 kg/ha | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Kiribati or Libya?
- Kiribati, at 3.03 kg/ha against 2.93 kg/ha in Libya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Kiribati and Libya?
- 0.1 kg/ha, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Libya?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Kiribati and Libya rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Kiribati ranks 170th and Libya ranks 171st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).