Latvia vs Saint Lucia: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Latvia
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 19.47 kg/ha against 18.91 kg/ha in Saint Lucia, a difference of 0.56 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Saint Lucia ahead.
Latvia ranks 103rd and Saint Lucia ranks 106th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Saint Lucia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 13.64 kg/ha | 22.29 kg/ha | 8.65 kg/ha | Saint Lucia |
| 2000s | 15.05 kg/ha | 16.24 kg/ha | 1.19 kg/ha | Saint Lucia |
| 2010s | 19.82 kg/ha | 18.45 kg/ha | 1.38 kg/ha | Latvia |
| 2020s | 20.26 kg/ha | 18.88 kg/ha | 1.39 kg/ha | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Latvia or Saint Lucia?
- Latvia, at 19.47 kg/ha against 18.91 kg/ha in Saint Lucia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Latvia and Saint Lucia?
- 0.56 kg/ha, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Saint Lucia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and Saint Lucia rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Latvia ranks 103rd and Saint Lucia ranks 106th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).