Malawi vs Uruguay: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Malawi
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 29.35 kg/ha against 29.24 kg/ha in Malawi, a difference of 0.11 kg/ha.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.
Malawi ranks 64th and Uruguay ranks 63rd of 186 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.1 kg/ha | 4.39 kg/ha | 3.28 kg/ha | Uruguay |
| 1970s | 2.42 kg/ha | 6.93 kg/ha | 4.51 kg/ha | Uruguay |
| 1980s | 4.09 kg/ha | 10.02 kg/ha | 5.93 kg/ha | Uruguay |
| 1990s | 5.07 kg/ha | 14.23 kg/ha | 9.15 kg/ha | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 7.03 kg/ha | 19.11 kg/ha | 12.07 kg/ha | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 11.08 kg/ha | 24.51 kg/ha | 13.44 kg/ha | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 18.93 kg/ha | 32.11 kg/ha | 13.18 kg/ha | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Malawi or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 29.35 kg/ha against 29.24 kg/ha in Malawi as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Malawi and Uruguay?
- 0.11 kg/ha, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Uruguay?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Malawi and Uruguay rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Malawi ranks 64th and Uruguay ranks 63rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).