Mali vs Sudan (former): Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Mali
- Sudan (former)
How they compare
Mali currently reports 3.28 kg/ha against 3.15 kg/ha in Sudan (former), a difference of 0.13 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mali ahead.
Mali ranks 180th and Sudan (former) ranks 183rd of 201 countries.
Mali has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Sudan (former) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.67 kg/ha | 1.3 kg/ha | 0.3648 kg/ha | Mali |
| 1970s | 2.17 kg/ha | 1.89 kg/ha | 0.2861 kg/ha | Mali |
| 1980s | 2.85 kg/ha | 2.6 kg/ha | 0.2484 kg/ha | Mali |
| 1990s | 2.44 kg/ha | 2.25 kg/ha | 0.1898 kg/ha | Mali |
| 2000s | 3.52 kg/ha | 2.83 kg/ha | 0.6894 kg/ha | Mali |
| 2010s | 4.06 kg/ha | 3.49 kg/ha | 0.5747 kg/ha | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Mali or Sudan (former)?
- Mali, at 3.28 kg/ha against 3.15 kg/ha in Sudan (former) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Mali and Sudan (former)?
- 0.13 kg/ha, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Sudan (former)?
- 51 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2011.
- How do Mali and Sudan (former) rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Mali ranks 180th and Sudan (former) ranks 183rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).