Montenegro vs Turkmenistan: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Montenegro
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 116.68 kg/ha against 109.95 kg/ha in Turkmenistan, a difference of 6.73 kg/ha.
That makes Montenegro's figure about 1.1 times Turkmenistan's.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Montenegro has been ahead every year.
Montenegro ranks 7th and Turkmenistan ranks 8th of 185 countries.
Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 157.48 kg/ha | 50.86 kg/ha | 106.63 kg/ha | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 133.67 kg/ha | 74.74 kg/ha | 58.93 kg/ha | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 116.49 kg/ha | 103.25 kg/ha | 13.24 kg/ha | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Montenegro or Turkmenistan?
- Montenegro, at 116.68 kg/ha against 109.95 kg/ha in Turkmenistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Montenegro and Turkmenistan?
- 6.73 kg/ha, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Turkmenistan?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Montenegro and Turkmenistan rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Montenegro ranks 7th and Turkmenistan ranks 8th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).