Panama vs Portugal: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Panama
- Portugal
How they compare
Portugal currently reports 26.08 kg/ha against 24.98 kg/ha in Panama, a difference of 1.1 kg/ha.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Portugal has been ahead every year.
Panama ranks 75th and Portugal ranks 72nd of 186 countries.
Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 8.68 kg/ha | 15.04 kg/ha | 6.36 kg/ha | Portugal |
| 1970s | 10.64 kg/ha | 19.31 kg/ha | 8.67 kg/ha | Portugal |
| 1980s | 12.12 kg/ha | 22.2 kg/ha | 10.08 kg/ha | Portugal |
| 1990s | 14.42 kg/ha | 23.42 kg/ha | 9 kg/ha | Portugal |
| 2000s | 12.47 kg/ha | 25.74 kg/ha | 13.26 kg/ha | Portugal |
| 2010s | 14 kg/ha | 31.37 kg/ha | 17.37 kg/ha | Portugal |
| 2020s | 22.14 kg/ha | 27.28 kg/ha | 5.14 kg/ha | Portugal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Panama or Portugal?
- Portugal, at 26.08 kg/ha against 24.98 kg/ha in Panama as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Panama and Portugal?
- 1.1 kg/ha, with Portugal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Portugal?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Panama and Portugal rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Panama ranks 75th and Portugal ranks 72nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).