Papua New Guinea vs Ukraine: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Ukraine
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 10.05 kg/ha against 9.61 kg/ha in Ukraine, a difference of 0.44 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Ukraine ahead.
Papua New Guinea ranks 127th and Ukraine ranks 130th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Papua New Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Ukraine in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.05 kg/ha | 11.54 kg/ha | 5.49 kg/ha | Ukraine |
| 2000s | 7.28 kg/ha | 7.13 kg/ha | 0.1472 kg/ha | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 9.13 kg/ha | 11.38 kg/ha | 2.25 kg/ha | Ukraine |
| 2020s | 10.36 kg/ha | 13.3 kg/ha | 2.94 kg/ha | Ukraine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Papua New Guinea or Ukraine?
- Papua New Guinea, at 10.05 kg/ha against 9.61 kg/ha in Ukraine as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Papua New Guinea and Ukraine?
- 0.44 kg/ha, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Ukraine?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Ukraine rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 127th and Ukraine ranks 130th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).