Qatar vs Republic of Moldova: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Qatar
- Republic of Moldova
How they compare
Qatar currently reports 63.31 kg/ha against 13.55 kg/ha in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 49.76 kg/ha.
That makes Qatar's figure about 4.7 times Republic of Moldova's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Qatar has been ahead every year.
Qatar ranks 22nd and Republic of Moldova ranks 8th of 186 countries.
Qatar has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Qatar | Republic of Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 56.66 kg/ha | 11.51 kg/ha | 45.15 kg/ha | Qatar |
| 2000s | 28.04 kg/ha | 5.97 kg/ha | 22.07 kg/ha | Qatar |
| 2010s | 37.74 kg/ha | 9.68 kg/ha | 28.06 kg/ha | Qatar |
| 2020s | 59.15 kg/ha | 11.64 kg/ha | 47.51 kg/ha | Qatar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Qatar or Republic of Moldova?
- Qatar, at 63.31 kg/ha against 13.55 kg/ha in Republic of Moldova as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Qatar and Republic of Moldova?
- 49.76 kg/ha, with Qatar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Qatar and Republic of Moldova?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Qatar and Republic of Moldova rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Qatar ranks 22nd and Republic of Moldova ranks 8th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).