Slovakia vs Uruguay: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Slovakia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Slovakia currently reports 29.6 kg/ha against 29.35 kg/ha in Uruguay, a difference of 0.25 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Slovakia ahead.
Slovakia ranks 64th and Uruguay ranks 65th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Slovakia averaged higher in 3 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovakia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 23.93 kg/ha | 14.98 kg/ha | 8.95 kg/ha | Slovakia |
| 2000s | 25.09 kg/ha | 19.11 kg/ha | 5.98 kg/ha | Slovakia |
| 2010s | 31.33 kg/ha | 24.51 kg/ha | 6.82 kg/ha | Slovakia |
| 2020s | 32.04 kg/ha | 32.11 kg/ha | 0.0686 kg/ha | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Slovakia or Uruguay?
- Slovakia, at 29.6 kg/ha against 29.35 kg/ha in Uruguay as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Slovakia and Uruguay?
- 0.25 kg/ha, with Slovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovakia and Uruguay?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Slovakia and Uruguay rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Slovakia ranks 64th and Uruguay ranks 65th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).