South America vs Uzbekistan: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- South America
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 86.79 kg/ha against 24.28 kg/ha in South America, a difference of 62.51 kg/ha.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 3.6 times South America's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Uzbekistan has been ahead every year.
South America ranks 9th and Uzbekistan ranks 10th of 29 groups.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South America | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 12.51 kg/ha | 55.47 kg/ha | 42.96 kg/ha | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 15.96 kg/ha | 44.56 kg/ha | 28.61 kg/ha | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 19.82 kg/ha | 63.7 kg/ha | 43.88 kg/ha | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 25.03 kg/ha | 82.55 kg/ha | 57.51 kg/ha | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, South America or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 86.79 kg/ha against 24.28 kg/ha in South America as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between South America and Uzbekistan?
- 62.51 kg/ha, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South America and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do South America and Uzbekistan rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- South America ranks 9th and Uzbekistan ranks 10th of 29 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).