Suriname vs Turkmenistan: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Suriname
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Turkmenistan currently reports 109.95 kg/ha against 86.23 kg/ha in Suriname, a difference of 23.72 kg/ha.
That makes Turkmenistan's figure about 1.3 times Suriname's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Turkmenistan ahead.
Suriname ranks 11th and Turkmenistan ranks 8th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Suriname averaged higher in 1 and Turkmenistan in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Suriname | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 28.39 kg/ha | 31.23 kg/ha | 2.84 kg/ha | Turkmenistan |
| 2000s | 42.87 kg/ha | 37.87 kg/ha | 5 kg/ha | Suriname |
| 2010s | 48.15 kg/ha | 74.74 kg/ha | 26.6 kg/ha | Turkmenistan |
| 2020s | 66.28 kg/ha | 103.25 kg/ha | 36.97 kg/ha | Turkmenistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Suriname or Turkmenistan?
- Turkmenistan, at 109.95 kg/ha against 86.23 kg/ha in Suriname as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Suriname and Turkmenistan?
- 23.72 kg/ha, with Turkmenistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Suriname and Turkmenistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Suriname and Turkmenistan rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Suriname ranks 11th and Turkmenistan ranks 8th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).