Togo vs Tunisia: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Togo
- Tunisia
How they compare
Togo currently reports 5.17 kg/ha against 4.93 kg/ha in Tunisia, a difference of 0.24 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Togo ahead.
Togo ranks 162nd and Tunisia ranks 165th of 201 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Togo | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.5821 kg/ha | 0.6892 kg/ha | 0.1071 kg/ha | Tunisia |
| 1970s | 0.7578 kg/ha | 1.54 kg/ha | 0.7869 kg/ha | Tunisia |
| 1980s | 1.13 kg/ha | 2.89 kg/ha | 1.76 kg/ha | Tunisia |
| 1990s | 1.7 kg/ha | 3.66 kg/ha | 1.96 kg/ha | Tunisia |
| 2000s | 1.53 kg/ha | 4.84 kg/ha | 3.31 kg/ha | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 2.61 kg/ha | 5.59 kg/ha | 2.98 kg/ha | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 3.71 kg/ha | 6.23 kg/ha | 2.53 kg/ha | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Togo or Tunisia?
- Togo, at 5.17 kg/ha against 4.93 kg/ha in Tunisia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Togo and Tunisia?
- 0.24 kg/ha, with Togo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Togo and Tunisia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Togo and Tunisia rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Togo ranks 162nd and Tunisia ranks 165th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).