Uganda vs Yemen: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Uganda
- Yemen
How they compare
Yemen currently reports 3.88 kg/ha against 3.86 kg/ha in Uganda, a difference of 0.02 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Yemen ahead.
Uganda ranks 174th and Yemen ranks 172nd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Uganda averaged higher in 1 and Yemen in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Uganda | Yemen | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.5536 kg/ha | 0.7106 kg/ha | 0.157 kg/ha | Yemen |
| 1970s | 0.6867 kg/ha | 1.24 kg/ha | 0.5562 kg/ha | Yemen |
| 1980s | 0.7038 kg/ha | 3.65 kg/ha | 2.94 kg/ha | Yemen |
| 1990s | 1.4 kg/ha | 3.34 kg/ha | 1.94 kg/ha | Yemen |
| 2000s | 1.98 kg/ha | 4.18 kg/ha | 2.2 kg/ha | Yemen |
| 2010s | 2.89 kg/ha | 5.23 kg/ha | 2.33 kg/ha | Yemen |
| 2020s | 3.71 kg/ha | 3.62 kg/ha | 0.0877 kg/ha | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Uganda or Yemen?
- Yemen, at 3.88 kg/ha against 3.86 kg/ha in Uganda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Uganda and Yemen?
- 0.02 kg/ha, with Yemen ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Uganda and Yemen?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Uganda and Yemen rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Uganda ranks 174th and Yemen ranks 172nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).