Afghanistan vs Burkina Faso: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Afghanistan
- Burkina Faso
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 32,873 t against 32,186 t in Afghanistan, a difference of 687 t.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Afghanistan ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 85th and Burkina Faso ranks 84th of 186 countries.
Afghanistan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Burkina Faso | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 20,060 t | 1,925 t | 18,135 t | Afghanistan |
| 1970s | 26,081 t | 2,696 t | 23,385 t | Afghanistan |
| 1980s | 28,702 t | 5,617 t | 23,085 t | Afghanistan |
| 1990s | 20,823 t | 10,845 t | 9,977 t | Afghanistan |
| 2000s | 22,136 t | 19,324 t | 2,812 t | Afghanistan |
| 2010s | 41,945 t | 31,237 t | 10,709 t | Afghanistan |
| 2020s | 31,712 t | 29,285 t | 2,427 t | Afghanistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Afghanistan or Burkina Faso?
- Burkina Faso, at 32,873 t against 32,186 t in Afghanistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Afghanistan and Burkina Faso?
- 687 t, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Burkina Faso?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Afghanistan and Burkina Faso rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Afghanistan ranks 85th and Burkina Faso ranks 84th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).