Afghanistan vs Mali: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Afghanistan
- Mali
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 32,186 t against 28,345 t in Mali, a difference of 3,841 t.
That makes Afghanistan's figure about 1.1 times Mali's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Afghanistan ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 85th and Mali ranks 88th of 186 countries.
Afghanistan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 20,060 t | 2,864 t | 17,196 t | Afghanistan |
| 1970s | 26,081 t | 4,163 t | 21,918 t | Afghanistan |
| 1980s | 28,702 t | 5,975 t | 22,726 t | Afghanistan |
| 1990s | 20,823 t | 8,119 t | 12,704 t | Afghanistan |
| 2000s | 22,136 t | 19,968 t | 2,168 t | Afghanistan |
| 2010s | 41,945 t | 37,142 t | 4,803 t | Afghanistan |
| 2020s | 31,712 t | 28,407 t | 3,305 t | Afghanistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Afghanistan or Mali?
- Afghanistan, at 32,186 t against 28,345 t in Mali as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Afghanistan and Mali?
- 3,841 t, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Mali?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Afghanistan and Mali rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Afghanistan ranks 85th and Mali ranks 88th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).