Albania vs Estonia: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Albania
- Estonia
How they compare
Albania currently reports 13,886 t against 13,581 t in Estonia, a difference of 305 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.
Albania ranks 120th and Estonia ranks 122nd of 201 countries.
Albania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Albania | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 15,114 t | 12,738 t | 2,376 t | Albania |
| 2000s | 20,434 t | 10,082 t | 10,351 t | Albania |
| 2010s | 20,506 t | 12,954 t | 7,552 t | Albania |
| 2020s | 14,868 t | 14,687 t | 180.67 t | Albania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Albania or Estonia?
- Albania, at 13,886 t against 13,581 t in Estonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Albania and Estonia?
- 305 t, with Albania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Estonia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Albania and Estonia rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Albania ranks 120th and Estonia ranks 122nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).