Angola vs Chad: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Angola
- Chad
How they compare
Chad currently reports 25,784 t against 24,168 t in Angola, a difference of 1,616 t.
That makes Chad's figure about 1.1 times Angola's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Angola ahead.
Angola ranks 94th and Chad ranks 91st of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 5 and Chad in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Chad | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2,936 t | 2,116 t | 820.01 t | Angola |
| 1970s | 5,308 t | 2,646 t | 2,661 t | Angola |
| 1980s | 6,151 t | 3,237 t | 2,914 t | Angola |
| 1990s | 5,490 t | 5,672 t | 181.41 t | Chad |
| 2000s | 8,236 t | 9,279 t | 1,043 t | Chad |
| 2010s | 20,282 t | 16,259 t | 4,023 t | Angola |
| 2020s | 23,960 t | 23,766 t | 194.57 t | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Angola or Chad?
- Chad, at 25,784 t against 24,168 t in Angola as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Angola and Chad?
- 1,616 t, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Chad?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Angola and Chad rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Angola ranks 94th and Chad ranks 91st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).