Argentina vs Uzbekistan: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Argentina
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 435,228 t against 387,795 t in Uzbekistan, a difference of 47,433 t.
That makes Argentina's figure about 1.1 times Uzbekistan's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Argentina ranks 18th and Uzbekistan ranks 21st of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 3 and Uzbekistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 154,870 t | 268,553 t | 113,683 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 247,359 t | 210,252 t | 37,108 t | Argentina |
| 2010s | 321,276 t | 282,933 t | 38,342 t | Argentina |
| 2020s | 512,312 t | 366,980 t | 145,332 t | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Argentina or Uzbekistan?
- Argentina, at 435,228 t against 387,795 t in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Argentina and Uzbekistan?
- 47,433 t, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Argentina and Uzbekistan rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Argentina ranks 18th and Uzbekistan ranks 21st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).