Armenia vs Botswana: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Armenia
- Botswana
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 5,947 t against 5,655 t in Botswana, a difference of 292 t.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.1 times Botswana's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Armenia has been ahead every year.
Armenia ranks 127th and Botswana ranks 128th of 186 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Botswana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3,763 t | 1,425 t | 2,337 t | Armenia |
| 2000s | 7,313 t | 1,393 t | 5,920 t | Armenia |
| 2010s | 18,773 t | 4,734 t | 14,039 t | Armenia |
| 2020s | 7,155 t | 4,904 t | 2,251 t | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Armenia or Botswana?
- Armenia, at 5,947 t against 5,655 t in Botswana as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Armenia and Botswana?
- 292 t, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Botswana?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Armenia and Botswana rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Armenia ranks 127th and Botswana ranks 128th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).