Australia vs Viet Nam: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Australia
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 628,707 t against 624,582 t in Australia, a difference of 4,125 t.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 14th and Viet Nam ranks 13th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and Viet Nam in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 49,292 t | 42,251 t | 7,041 t | Australia |
| 1970s | 85,523 t | 79,212 t | 6,311 t | Australia |
| 1980s | 121,526 t | 127,068 t | 5,543 t | Viet Nam |
| 1990s | 224,462 t | 297,225 t | 72,763 t | Viet Nam |
| 2000s | 291,839 t | 423,319 t | 131,480 t | Viet Nam |
| 2010s | 387,470 t | 514,506 t | 127,036 t | Viet Nam |
| 2020s | 576,096 t | 597,095 t | 20,999 t | Viet Nam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Australia or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 628,707 t against 624,582 t in Australia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Australia and Viet Nam?
- 4,125 t, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Viet Nam?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Australia and Viet Nam rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Australia ranks 14th and Viet Nam ranks 13th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).