Azerbaijan vs Benin: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen

Azerbaijan
22,997 t
in 2023
Benin
23,046 t
in 2023
Azerbaijan rank
107th
Benin rank
106th

Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Azerbaijan
  • Benin
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k196119922023

How they compare

Benin currently reports 23,046 t against 22,997 t in Azerbaijan, a difference of 49 t.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Azerbaijan ahead.

Azerbaijan ranks 107th and Benin ranks 106th of 201 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 3 and Benin in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Azerbaijan Benin Difference Ahead
1990s 11,524 t 7,513 t 4,011 t Azerbaijan
2000s 8,656 t 4,869 t 3,787 t Azerbaijan
2010s 21,051 t 9,307 t 11,744 t Azerbaijan
2020s 19,118 t 23,515 t 4,397 t Benin

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Azerbaijan or Benin?
Benin, at 23,046 t against 22,997 t in Azerbaijan as of 2023.
What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Azerbaijan and Benin?
49 t, with Benin ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Benin?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Azerbaijan and Benin rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
Azerbaijan ranks 107th and Benin ranks 106th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).