Azerbaijan vs Kyrgyzstan: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Azerbaijan
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 22,997 t against 22,399 t in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 598 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 98th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 99th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 11,524 t | 17,488 t | 5,964 t | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2000s | 8,656 t | 16,976 t | 8,320 t | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 21,051 t | 19,711 t | 1,340 t | Azerbaijan |
| 2020s | 19,118 t | 22,266 t | 3,149 t | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Azerbaijan or Kyrgyzstan?
- Azerbaijan, at 22,997 t against 22,399 t in Kyrgyzstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Azerbaijan and Kyrgyzstan?
- 598 t, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Kyrgyzstan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Azerbaijan and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Azerbaijan ranks 98th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 99th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).