Bahamas vs Sao Tome and Principe: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Bahamas
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Bahamas currently reports 236.49 t against 235.43 t in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 1.06 t.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Bahamas has been ahead every year.
Bahamas ranks 164th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 165th of 186 countries.
Bahamas has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 146.17 t | 22.79 t | 123.38 t | Bahamas |
| 1970s | 268.81 t | 18.67 t | 250.14 t | Bahamas |
| 1980s | 218.24 t | 15.34 t | 202.9 t | Bahamas |
| 1990s | 222.38 t | 18.25 t | 204.13 t | Bahamas |
| 2000s | 224.65 t | 74.09 t | 150.56 t | Bahamas |
| 2010s | 464.29 t | 178.08 t | 286.21 t | Bahamas |
| 2020s | 303.64 t | 222.48 t | 81.16 t | Bahamas |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Bahamas or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Bahamas, at 236.49 t against 235.43 t in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Bahamas and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 1.06 t, with Bahamas ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Bahamas and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Bahamas ranks 164th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 165th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).