Bahamas vs Singapore: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Bahamas
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 265.75 t against 236.49 t in Bahamas, a difference of 29.26 t.
That makes Singapore's figure about 1.1 times Bahamas's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Singapore ahead.
Bahamas ranks 178th and Singapore ranks 177th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 2 and Singapore in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 146.17 t | 1,605 t | 1,458 t | Singapore |
| 1970s | 268.81 t | 2,054 t | 1,786 t | Singapore |
| 1980s | 218.24 t | 1,707 t | 1,489 t | Singapore |
| 1990s | 222.38 t | 995.25 t | 772.87 t | Singapore |
| 2000s | 224.65 t | 326.97 t | 102.32 t | Singapore |
| 2010s | 464.29 t | 294.86 t | 169.44 t | Bahamas |
| 2020s | 303.64 t | 273.62 t | 30.02 t | Bahamas |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Bahamas or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 265.75 t against 236.49 t in Bahamas as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Bahamas and Singapore?
- 29.26 t, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Singapore?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Bahamas and Singapore rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Bahamas ranks 178th and Singapore ranks 177th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).