Bangladesh vs Republic of Moldova: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Bangladesh
- Republic of Moldova
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 531,743 t against 28,960 t in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 502,783 t.
That makes Bangladesh's figure about 18.4 times Republic of Moldova's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Bangladesh has been ahead every year.
Bangladesh ranks 14th and Republic of Moldova ranks 12th of 186 countries.
Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Republic of Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 312,960 t | 25,211 t | 287,749 t | Bangladesh |
| 2000s | 379,085 t | 12,759 t | 366,326 t | Bangladesh |
| 2010s | 441,587 t | 19,335 t | 422,252 t | Bangladesh |
| 2020s | 523,022 t | 24,835 t | 498,187 t | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Bangladesh or Republic of Moldova?
- Bangladesh, at 531,743 t against 28,960 t in Republic of Moldova as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Bangladesh and Republic of Moldova?
- 502,783 t, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Republic of Moldova?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Bangladesh and Republic of Moldova rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Bangladesh ranks 14th and Republic of Moldova ranks 12th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).