Barbados vs Malta: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Barbados
- Malta
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 546 t against 432.88 t in Malta, a difference of 113.12 t.
That makes Barbados's figure about 1.3 times Malta's.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Barbados ahead.
Barbados ranks 171st and Malta ranks 172nd of 201 countries.
Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,168 t | 377.9 t | 789.73 t | Barbados |
| 1970s | 811.5 t | 504.16 t | 307.33 t | Barbados |
| 1980s | 868.26 t | 655.45 t | 212.81 t | Barbados |
| 1990s | 895.81 t | 772.88 t | 122.93 t | Barbados |
| 2000s | 758.77 t | 741.35 t | 17.42 t | Barbados |
| 2010s | 615.32 t | 562.17 t | 53.15 t | Barbados |
| 2020s | 542.72 t | 464.3 t | 78.43 t | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Barbados or Malta?
- Barbados, at 546 t against 432.88 t in Malta as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Barbados and Malta?
- 113.12 t, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Malta?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Barbados and Malta rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Barbados ranks 171st and Malta ranks 172nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).