Belgium vs Chile: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Belgium
- Chile
How they compare
Chile currently reports 82,237 t against 73,456 t in Belgium, a difference of 8,781 t.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Belgium's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Chile ahead.
Belgium ranks 51st and Chile ranks 48th of 186 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Chile | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 82,400 t | 77,122 t | 5,278 t | Belgium |
| 2010s | 93,517 t | 86,019 t | 7,498 t | Belgium |
| 2020s | 82,590 t | 81,657 t | 933.3 t | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Belgium or Chile?
- Chile, at 82,237 t against 73,456 t in Belgium as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Belgium and Chile?
- 8,781 t, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Chile?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Chile rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Belgium ranks 51st and Chile ranks 48th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).