Belgium vs Zambia: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen

Belgium
73,456 t
in 2023
Zambia
77,503 t
in 2023
Belgium rank
56th
Zambia rank
54th

Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Belgium
  • Zambia
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k196119922023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 77,503 t against 73,456 t in Belgium, a difference of 4,047 t.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Belgium's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.

Belgium ranks 56th and Zambia ranks 54th of 201 countries.

Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Zambia Difference Ahead
2000s 82,400 t 16,670 t 65,730 t Belgium
2010s 93,517 t 50,520 t 42,997 t Belgium
2020s 82,590 t 65,751 t 16,838 t Belgium

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Belgium or Zambia?
Zambia, at 77,503 t against 73,456 t in Belgium as of 2023.
What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Belgium and Zambia?
4,047 t, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Zambia?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Belgium and Zambia rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
Belgium ranks 56th and Zambia ranks 54th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).