Bhutan vs Malta: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Bhutan
- Malta
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 767.21 t against 432.88 t in Malta, a difference of 334.33 t.
That makes Bhutan's figure about 1.8 times Malta's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bhutan ahead.
Bhutan ranks 169th and Malta ranks 172nd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 4 and Malta in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 384.92 t | 377.9 t | 7.02 t | Bhutan |
| 1970s | 492.48 t | 504.16 t | 11.68 t | Malta |
| 1980s | 660.13 t | 655.45 t | 4.68 t | Bhutan |
| 1990s | 564.53 t | 772.88 t | 208.34 t | Malta |
| 2000s | 740.69 t | 741.35 t | 0.6567 t | Malta |
| 2010s | 876.08 t | 562.17 t | 313.91 t | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 873.94 t | 464.3 t | 409.64 t | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Bhutan or Malta?
- Bhutan, at 767.21 t against 432.88 t in Malta as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Bhutan and Malta?
- 334.33 t, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Malta?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Bhutan and Malta rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Bhutan ranks 169th and Malta ranks 172nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).