Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Georgia: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Georgia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 14,302 t against 13,965 t in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 337 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Georgia ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 107th and Georgia ranks 106th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 3 and Georgia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10,417 t | 13,895 t | 3,478 t | Georgia |
| 2000s | 18,350 t | 9,160 t | 9,191 t | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 34,918 t | 6,806 t | 28,112 t | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2020s | 21,002 t | 14,701 t | 6,301 t | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Georgia?
- Georgia, at 14,302 t against 13,965 t in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Georgia?
- 337 t, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Georgia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Georgia rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 107th and Georgia ranks 106th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).