Brazil vs Russian Federation: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Brazil
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 2.16 million t against 1.01 million t in Russian Federation, a difference of 1.15 million t.
That makes Brazil's figure about 2.1 times Russian Federation's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Brazil ranks 5th and Russian Federation ranks 8th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 3 and Russian Federation in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 705,548 t | 982,678 t | 277,130 t | Russian Federation |
| 2000s | 1.03 million t | 661,015 t | 366,291 t | Brazil |
| 2010s | 1.53 million t | 749,042 t | 785,265 t | Brazil |
| 2020s | 2.17 million t | 974,844 t | 1.19 million t | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Brazil or Russian Federation?
- Brazil, at 2.16 million t against 1.01 million t in Russian Federation as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Brazil and Russian Federation?
- 1.15 million t, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Russian Federation?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Brazil and Russian Federation rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Brazil ranks 5th and Russian Federation ranks 8th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).