Brazil vs USSR: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Brazil
- USSR
How they compare
USSR currently reports 3.95 million t against 2.16 million t in Brazil, a difference of 1.79 million t.
That makes USSR's figure about 1.8 times Brazil's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, USSR has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 5th and USSR ranks 4th of 201 countries.
USSR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | USSR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 224,022 t | 1.96 million t | 1.74 million t | USSR |
| 1970s | 396,154 t | 3.45 million t | 3.05 million t | USSR |
| 1980s | 544,928 t | 4.70 million t | 4.16 million t | USSR |
| 1990s | 585,365 t | 4.11 million t | 3.52 million t | USSR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Brazil or USSR?
- USSR, at 3.95 million t against 2.16 million t in Brazil as of 1991.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Brazil and USSR?
- 1.79 million t, with USSR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and USSR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Brazil and USSR rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Brazil ranks 5th and USSR ranks 4th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).