Burundi vs New Zealand: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Burundi
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 10,450 t against 9,424 t in Burundi, a difference of 1,026 t.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Burundi's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Burundi ranks 117th and New Zealand ranks 114th of 185 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 363.36 t | 1,127 t | 763.65 t | New Zealand |
| 1970s | 720.06 t | 1,564 t | 844.44 t | New Zealand |
| 1980s | 1,015 t | 1,758 t | 743.13 t | New Zealand |
| 1990s | 1,149 t | 4,106 t | 2,956 t | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 1,290 t | 8,794 t | 7,503 t | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 4,709 t | 11,398 t | 6,690 t | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 8,357 t | 11,832 t | 3,475 t | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Burundi or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 10,450 t against 9,424 t in Burundi as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Burundi and New Zealand?
- 1,026 t, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and New Zealand?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Burundi and New Zealand rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Burundi ranks 117th and New Zealand ranks 114th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).