Cabo Verde vs Malta: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Cabo Verde
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 432.88 t against 397.98 t in Cabo Verde, a difference of 34.9 t.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.1 times Cabo Verde's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malta ahead.
Cabo Verde ranks 173rd and Malta ranks 172nd of 201 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 81.62 t | 377.9 t | 296.28 t | Malta |
| 1970s | 134.02 t | 504.16 t | 370.14 t | Malta |
| 1980s | 298.65 t | 655.45 t | 356.8 t | Malta |
| 1990s | 742.77 t | 772.88 t | 30.1 t | Malta |
| 2000s | 638.17 t | 741.35 t | 103.18 t | Malta |
| 2010s | 434.04 t | 562.17 t | 128.13 t | Malta |
| 2020s | 396.87 t | 464.3 t | 67.43 t | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Cabo Verde or Malta?
- Malta, at 432.88 t against 397.98 t in Cabo Verde as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Cabo Verde and Malta?
- 34.9 t, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Malta?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cabo Verde and Malta rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Cabo Verde ranks 173rd and Malta ranks 172nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).