Cabo Verde vs New Caledonia: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Cabo Verde
- New Caledonia
How they compare
Cabo Verde currently reports 397.98 t against 384.54 t in New Caledonia, a difference of 13.44 t.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Caledonia ahead.
Cabo Verde ranks 173rd and New Caledonia ranks 174th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Cabo Verde averaged higher in 4 and New Caledonia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 81.62 t | 163.47 t | 81.85 t | New Caledonia |
| 1970s | 134.02 t | 214.44 t | 80.42 t | New Caledonia |
| 1980s | 298.65 t | 334.25 t | 35.6 t | New Caledonia |
| 1990s | 742.77 t | 320.9 t | 421.87 t | Cabo Verde |
| 2000s | 638.17 t | 415.45 t | 222.72 t | Cabo Verde |
| 2010s | 434.04 t | 392.5 t | 41.54 t | Cabo Verde |
| 2020s | 396.87 t | 386.69 t | 10.18 t | Cabo Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen, Cabo Verde or New Caledonia?
- Cabo Verde, at 397.98 t against 384.54 t in New Caledonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen between Cabo Verde and New Caledonia?
- 13.44 t, with Cabo Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and New Caledonia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cabo Verde and New Caledonia rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen?
- Cabo Verde ranks 173rd and New Caledonia ranks 174th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).